The movement

ReclaimYourFace is a European movement that brings people’s voices into the discussion around biometric data used to monitor the population. We question why these sensitive data are being used, and raise the alarm on the impact on our freedoms in public spaces





We believe in:

Public spaces where everyone can express themselves freely and without fear

Cities where politicians don't hide behind words that are difficult to understand, or behind contracts with private companies.

Countries where governments are accountable to their people.

We believe that a ban on biometric mass surveillance across Europe is the only way.



People are mobilising

Our coalition is made up of concerned people and European civil society organisations united to protect fundamental rights in the digital environment

  • ✍️ Show your support by signing Hermes Center's petition now!


    Background
    In Italy, the use of biometric and facial recognition technologies is already widespread on two different levels: at the national one and at municipal one. The SARI system acquired by the scientific police has proved to be immediately controversial and covered by a veil of extreme secrecy. On a local level, instead, the dystopian experiment in the city of Como was stopped by a measure of the Italian Data Protection Authority thanks also to a timely journalistic investigation—with the contribution of the Hermes Center—that underlined the importance of greater transparency on the decision-making processes behind the installation of biometric recognition technologies. Yet, other cities have already announced the installation of similar technologies, such as Turin and Udine.



    Actions
    Building on the results obtained in Como, the Hermes Center is calling for:

    • the DPA to monitor the use of biometric recognition systems by Italian municipalities;
    • the DPA to immediately close the investigation opened two years ago on the SARI Real-Time system and prevent the police from using it;
    • the cities of Turin and Udine to immediately publish the privacy impact assessment (DPIA) of the biometric systems they intend to install;
    • the Ministry of the Interior to publish all the evaluations of the algorithms used, the usage statistics of the system, and all the data related to the type of faces in the database used by SARI;
    • all metropolitan cities to commit to suspend any facial/biometric recognition project already started and prohibit the introduction of such technologies in the public spaces.


    For more information, contact The Hermes Center for Transparency and Digital Human Rights.



  • ✍️ Show your support by signing SHARE Foundation's petition now!



    Smart surveillance cameras have been installed in the streets of Belgrade without public participation, discussion of consequences, and regardless of the principles provided by the law and the Constitution. SHARE Foundation is gathering supporters to call for a ban of biometric mass surveillance.

    For more information, contact SHARE Foundation.



  • ✍️ Show your support by signing IuRe's petition now!



    In the Czech Republic, a camera system with biometric functions is probably currently used only at Prague Airport. In 2019, Prague City Hall rejected a request from the police to install this face-recognition surveillance technology onto selected cameras in public spaces. However, the introduction of similar systems in Prague is currently being considered again - the media recently informed that in the autumn of 2020 police representatives announced that they had bought top recognition software from Cogniware. It is not yet clear, however, to what extent it will be used.

    In any case, the use of biometric camera systems is currently based only on the very vague provisions of the Police Act written at the time of analog cameras while there is no sufficient legislation in the Czech Republic on new police authorization to work with digital photographs obtained from state registers. 

    As part of its Digital Freedom program, IuRe (Iuridicum Remedium) is currently mapping biometric identification systems in the Czech Republic, including setting up their safeguards against misuse and data leakage. After finishing the legal study, IuRe will organize a seminar in the Parliament of the Czech Republic, where it wants to clearly present the risks of biometric identification in public space to the lawmakers. IuRe stands on firm ground: in the spring of 2020, IuRe has persuaded councilors in Prague 1 to step down from securing access to houses by biometric means.

    For more information, contact Iuridicum Remedium.



  • ✍️ Show your support by signing Homo Digitalis' petition now!


    In Greece in 2020, Homo Digitalis conducted legal actions related to biometric data processing activities of the Hellenic Police (HP). Specifically, in March 2020 the Greek watchdog filed a request for opinion to the Greek DPA regarding a smart policing contract of the HP. This contact aims at developing smart devices with integrated software enabling facial recognition and automated fingerprint identification of individuals during police stops.

    Moreover, in June 2020 Homo Digitalis filed 2 strategic complaints before the Greek DPA against a central database of the HP, which stores fingerprints of all Greek passport's holders without a proper legal basis. Following these actions, the Greek DPA officially started investigating both cases in August 2020.

    For more information, contact Homo Digitalis.



  • ✉️ Sign up to stay informed about Bits of Freedom's work against biometric surveillance

    In the Netherlands, the use of biometric surveillance technology is on the rise. In particular we've seen the use of facial recognition in supermarkets, at the airport and at soccer stadiums. The technology is also deployed by the police, who maintain a facial recognition database that currently offers information on 1.4 million individuals. Often, biometric surveillance technologies like facial recognition are introduced in our public space under the guise of a pilot or, especially in smart city contexts, "Living Lab", sidestepping regulatory requirements and frustrating civic engagement.

    Biometric surveillance technology in public space can be used to categorize, track, control and/or identify individuals and groups of individuals. Bits of Freedom believes this practice constitutes mass surveillance and should be banned from our streets.

    We're currently working at a national and a European level towards a strict ban on biometric mass surveillance in public space. We're doing that through advocacy and by raising awareness about associated risks and existing practices.

    You can contribute, too. Sign up for our biometrics mailing list to receive news and calls to action.

    For more information, contact Bits of Freedom

  • Your fingerprints are a globally unique biometric identifier that stays with you for your lifetime. Once governments, authorities, companies, secret services or criminals get hold of them, you will not be able to undo the damage. Fingerprints are highly sensitive biometric data. This is why governments and others want them so badly, and why Digitalcourage is taking action to protect them.

    If citizens are obliged to allow their fingers to be scanned and their fingerprints to be saved (for example on ID cards or in data bases), this data will be used for more and more purposes. Over time, digital fingerprints will be shared around the world in various databases. So don’t forget: Reclaim Your Face also means Reclaim Your Fingerprints!

    Here is the EU state of play:

    From August 2, 2021 fingerprints in ID cards will become compulsory. Despite criticism from data protection and fundamental rights organisations, EU governments and a narrow majority in the EU Parliament adopted a regulation to ‘strengthen the security of ID cards and residence documents’ (EU regulation 2019/1157) in 2019.

    But you can still act. In some states (for instance in Germany) it is possible to request ID cards without fingerprints until August 2, 2021. Even though the regulation – and a national implementation law in some states – has already been adopted, activists can inform citizens about their options. They can also explore legal options (as Digitalcourage is doing in Germany) and raise awareness of the dangers of biometric mass fingerprinting. Spread the criticism in your state!

    In our view, mandatory fingerprinting is a mistake: It does not solve any problems, but raises political, technical, fundamental and ethical threats.

    Here is what you can do:

    1. Get organised! Stay informed and inform others. Support the campaign and follow digitalecourage's work

    2. Find out what is going on in your state. Share your information in this pad: https://pad.foebud.org/fnf20-fingerprinting-id

    3. Feel free to spread and translate information by Digitalcourage and other organisations:
    German: https://digitalcourage.de/blog/2020/keine-fingerabdruecke-personalausweis-persoohnefinger English: https://digitalcourage.de/blog/2020/no-fingerprinting-for-id-cards

Access Now ARTICLE19 Bits of Freedom CCC Digitalcourage EDRi Hermes Center for Transparency and Digital Human Rights Homo Digitalis IuRe La Quadrature du Net Panoptykon Foundation Privacy International SHARE Foundation